Nemo me impune lacessit

No one provokes me with impunity

____________________________________

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Article 1, Section 9, Constitution of the United States

If this is the law of the land...why in a republic (little r) and as republicans, do we allow mere POLITICIANS to the right to use a "title of office" for the rest of their lives as if it were de facto a patent of nobility. Because, as republicans, this should NOT be the case...just saying...

The Vail Spot's Amazon Store

Showing posts with label Eric Holder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric Holder. Show all posts

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Fast & Furious: Afterburner by Bill Whittle

Here's Bill Whittle's Afterburner on Fast & Furious



Saturday, April 02, 2011

U.S. Dep of Justice ditches red, white, and blue stars and stripes.

I find  it deeply troubling that this administration's Dept of Justice has changed it's website from the traditional "Red White and Blue"


 to a very austere black and white.



http://www.justice.gov/



Futhermore, instead of a quote from one of the founding father's or a notable jurist, this administration has chosen a quote from a very obscure figure of the 1930's. "The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."  C. Wilfred Jenks, and  was a leading supporter of the "international law" movement.  The goal of this movement is to replace national laws with a "global common law" that gives all workers basic rights.

I suspect that this is yet another example of the Obama Curse.  Hopefully this won't turn to shit, like everything else he's done the past 2 years.

Monday, July 19, 2010

NAACP Showing Racism Itself

NAACP who recently condemned the Tea Party Movement as being racist is caught with their pants down cheering a USDA official who cost a white Georgia farmer his home, his farm and his family's livelyhood. 
Andrew Breitbart announced that he would publish at least one video of the NAACP itself cheering racism. Breitbart delivers on that promise today at Big Government, showing USDA official Shirley Sherrod explain to an appreciative NAACP audience in July 2009 how she deliberately withheld information from a white farmer in Georgia trying to save his land and his business:



Far from being a post-raicial presidency, this administration and it's loyal minions are undoing the work of an entire generation...they have in the course of a few short months undone the work of the past 50 years.  This nation is now as polarized as it was at the height of the 1960's prior to the asssasination of Martin Luther King, Jr.  Far from being proud, the NAACP, which was founded by 2 jewish lawyer and to black lawyers in 1905, they should be ashamed of what they have done over the past 5 years.

via Hot Air

UPDATE:  WCBS TV has picked up the story...and Ms. Sherrod has resigned.  Here's a couple of comments from that story: 
By David posted 44 minutes and 55 seconds ago " One absolutley certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans,French-Americans,Scaandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality" Teddy Roosevelt "You cannot become thorough Americans if you think of yourselves in groups. America does not consist of groups. A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American" Woodrow Wilson Congratulations democrats, you are the party of identity politics.

By Sparky2 posted 1 hr(s) 37 minutes and 53 seconds ago I think to be a 'racist' doesn't have the same stigma it once had. Everyone would agree to discrimnate against someone just because of their race is wrong. However, we have seen so much reverse discrimination along with blacks being the biggest 'racists' in the country, example how they vote for black candidates just because they are black (look at the black senate candidate in SC, or the huge 97% black vote for Obama, to name a few. If someone voted for a white candidate just because they were white, they would be labeled a racist. Another example, the virtual zero coverage by the national media on the New Black Panther Party that intimidated voters at the polls, whereas if it was a KKK member they would have been ostricized by the media. So, now when a person or group is labeled a 'racist', in some cases, it may actually help them

By lawlak posted Mon Jul 19 2010 5:51:53 PM I am sure the Obama Department of Justice is going to investigate this obvious case of racism against the white male by a government official. I am sure that the Civil Rights Division is all over this. Oh wait, they only investigate racism against blacks and not against whites. This is probably actually encouraged by the DOJ. Remember that in November when you vote. Flag/Report offensive Comment

By isnrblog posted Mon Jul 19 2010 5:44:01 PM A white person would get slammed for making such statements. NAALCP, National Association for the Advancement of Liberal Colored People. Blacks are just as racist if not more so than whites. So "here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough," No you didn't. You didn't give him the "full force" of what you could do. So "Shirley Sherrod, USDA Rural Development Georgia State Director," an employee of the Federal Government openly acted racist. I am calling for her to be fired.
So much for a "post-racial" presidency...reap what you sew, Mr. Obama.

UPDATE:   Here is an important commentary on this whole thing: 
One thing about the NAACP video of Shirley Sherrod…that nobody is mentioning.

Look at the crowd reaction when she says this. Is there shock? Is there disgust? Is there anger? Nope, they are with her all the way.

That says more about the NAACP than anything Sherrod did. The NAACP didn’t reject Shirley Sherrod that night or last week because they never had a problem with what she said.

If Andrew Brietbart didn’t put out that video they would still be behind her. The only reason why Ben Jealous et/al have rejected Sherrod is because what she said to them behind closed doors in the past has been exposed to the general public. It is the same as Barack Obama and Rev Wright, if those videos of Wright didn’t exist he would be a regular guest at the White House today.

It would be very interesting to find people in that crowd and ask them if they had a problem with what she said when she said it.
Indeed, look closely at the audience's reaction...it's complete agreement and approval.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

New Black Panther Party President Admits Voter Intimidation

Eric Holder's Dept of Justice will not bring any sort of voter intimidation charges against minorities no matter how blatant those charges are: 
“I was told by Voting Section management that cases are not going to be brought against Black defendants for the benefit of White victims. That if somebody wanted to bring these cases, it was up to the US Attorney but the Civil Rights Division wasn’t going to be bringing it.”  J. Christian Adam, former DoJ Atty.


Damningly, here's Shabazz caught on video instructing his disciples that just as soon as a “Black man” was appointed as Attorney General, the charges were tossed out and career attornies were instructed not to bring these sort of charge up again. 
Under these new revelations and the increasing pressure from the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, how long can Attorney General Eric Holder allow the perception to remain that crimes under his watch are only enforced if the victims and the perpetrators fit the correct racial profile?


If this continues to be the policy of the Obama Administration, while he may continue to have upwards of 90% of the black vote, he'll lose pretty much everything else.  American's don't like this kind of behavior in our law enforment officials.  So much for the "post-racial president," as in all other aspects of his presidency, he's hyper-partisan.

Thursday, July 08, 2010

New Black Panther Party Leader

Here's the guy that leads the Philadelphia New Black Panther Party...and he's a "very nice young man"...




...NOT!  Yet, as has been clearly shown, this man was detering "non-minority" voters (that's Politcally Correct speak for white people) from voting in Philadelphis in 2008.  The Dept of Justice won the case...they won the case  and were getting ready to recommend sentencing when the Obama Administration stepped in and dismissed the case (through political appointees, albeit, but SOMEONE higher than an Assistant Secretary made this decision).  Hope & Change at work for us, in the new transperency of the Obama Administration...
Attorneys within the DoJ wondered why the federal government had suddenly become disinterested in voter intimidation. Some, like Christian Adams, Asheesh Agarwal, and Mark Corallo have gone public with their outrage,


Remember November

Friday, May 14, 2010

Holder Admits NOT Reading AZ Law Before Criticizing It

Attorney General Eric Holder, just like the rest of the Democratic leadership, admitted before the House Judiciary Committee hearing that he'd not yet read the Arizona law that mirrors Federal statutes in language...so far, no-one in this Administration has admitted to actually reading any of the bill that have been passed in this last year...of course, neither has Congress! 
Despite repeatedly voicing concerns about Arizona's new immigration enforcement law in recent weeks and threatening to challenge it, Attorney General Eric Holder said Thursday he has not yet read the law -- which is only 10 pages long.  "I have not had a chance to -- I've glanced at it," Holder said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing when asked by Rep.Ted Poe, R-Texas whether Holder has read the state law cracking down on illegal immigrants.  "I'll give you my copy of it if you would like," Poe responded.

Holder told reporters last month that he fears the new law is subject to abuse and that the Justice Department and the Homeland Security Department are in the midst of conducting a review.  [yet, he couldn't be bothered to actually READ THE DAMN THING!, ed.]

The Arizona law requires local and state law enforcement to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the country illegally, and makes it a state crime to be in the United States illegally.



This is a problem with many of our political class today.  They're quick to condemn...even though they don't have all the facts of the matter in hand.  Hillary Clinton condemned this law as well as ALL of the Congressional Democratic leadership, while not having actually read the law.  Our liberal leaning media has conducted an all out offensive against Arizona and the state legilature there...yet despite this,
60-70 percent of Americans support the law.

That just goes to show you that the country at large recognizes that there is a huge problem with our unsecure southern border, that those who actually have the responsibility to do something...refuse to.  It's time to secure the border, then enforce the laws on the books NOW, not give an amnesty to people who have broken our laws and entered the country illegally.

How can we expect our country to be run by people who don't read the bills they write, or the laws they are condeming?  Congress passed a nearly 3,000 page health care seizure bill without understanding just effect it would have...along straight party/partisan lines.  James Madison said, I would add, what good does it to be in a leadership position when you can't be bothered to actually read what you are condeming in such sweeping terms?
It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood .